<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Patterns I Hate #1: Singleton</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tech.puredanger.com/index.php/2007/07/03/pattern-hate-singleton/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tech.puredanger.com/2007/07/03/pattern-hate-singleton/</link>
	<description>Alex Miller&#039;s technical blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 19:39:50 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Another Architectural Framework, But Why? &#124; shaun smith</title>
		<link>http://tech.puredanger.com/2007/07/03/pattern-hate-singleton/comment-page-2/#comment-296100</link>
		<dc:creator>Another Architectural Framework, But Why? &#124; shaun smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 03:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.puredanger.com/2007/07/03/pattern-hate-singleton/#comment-296100</guid>
		<description>[...] standard Singleton implementation (that static getInstance method) is severely flawed. Unless you are writing device drivers, there is almost no excuse to touch a Singleton with [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] standard Singleton implementation (that static getInstance method) is severely flawed. Unless you are writing device drivers, there is almost no excuse to touch a Singleton with [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Singleton pattern &#124; Honey Mercy</title>
		<link>http://tech.puredanger.com/2007/07/03/pattern-hate-singleton/comment-page-1/#comment-287986</link>
		<dc:creator>Singleton pattern &#124; Honey Mercy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 02:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.puredanger.com/2007/07/03/pattern-hate-singleton/#comment-287986</guid>
		<description>[...] Alex Miller. Patterns I hate #1: Singleton, July [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Alex Miller. Patterns I hate #1: Singleton, July [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FLEX 4 : Dependency Injection Using Parsley at CodesOfMyLife</title>
		<link>http://tech.puredanger.com/2007/07/03/pattern-hate-singleton/comment-page-1/#comment-283876</link>
		<dc:creator>FLEX 4 : Dependency Injection Using Parsley at CodesOfMyLife</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 19:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.puredanger.com/2007/07/03/pattern-hate-singleton/#comment-283876</guid>
		<description>[...] the code harder to maintain and test and its also referred to as &#8216;anti-pattern&#8217; now [4][5][6]. On the other hand the creation of instances is handled by DI container and the dependent [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the code harder to maintain and test and its also referred to as &#8216;anti-pattern&#8217; now [4][5][6]. On the other hand the creation of instances is handled by DI container and the dependent [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Adventures in Software &#187; Random Number Generators: There should be only one</title>
		<link>http://tech.puredanger.com/2007/07/03/pattern-hate-singleton/comment-page-1/#comment-257216</link>
		<dc:creator>New Adventures in Software &#187; Random Number Generators: There should be only one</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 00:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.puredanger.com/2007/07/03/pattern-hate-singleton/#comment-257216</guid>
		<description>[...] could use the singleton pattern to restrict the number of instances to one, but that approach is frowned upon these days.  Dependency injection is the more politically correct alternative, just pass your [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] could use the singleton pattern to restrict the number of instances to one, but that approach is frowned upon these days.  Dependency injection is the more politically correct alternative, just pass your [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Confluence: Fritt om fag</title>
		<link>http://tech.puredanger.com/2007/07/03/pattern-hate-singleton/comment-page-1/#comment-205477</link>
		<dc:creator>Confluence: Fritt om fag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 21:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.puredanger.com/2007/07/03/pattern-hate-singleton/#comment-205477</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Foretrukne patterns...&lt;/strong&gt;

Patternkatalog I motsetning til Forslag til løsning (som skal inneholde egenproduserte løsningsforslag), er denne siden ment å inneholde en oversikt over kjente patterns også våre egne ting,......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Foretrukne patterns&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Patternkatalog I motsetning til Forslag til løsning (som skal inneholde egenproduserte løsningsforslag), er denne siden ment å inneholde en oversikt over kjente patterns også våre egne ting,&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

