<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Concurrency trends</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tech.puredanger.com/index.php/2007/08/14/concurrency-terracotta/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tech.puredanger.com/2007/08/14/concurrency-terracotta/</link>
	<description>Alex Miller&#039;s technical blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 19:39:50 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://tech.puredanger.com/2007/08/14/concurrency-terracotta/comment-page-1/#comment-6265</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 17:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.puredanger.com/2007/08/14/concurrency-terracotta/#comment-6265</guid>
		<description>Venkk, thanks for the comment - good to see people out there pushing this boundary ahead of us!  Could I forward your comment to our field engineering team?  They would likely love to setup a one hour con call to discuss your use case.  And they can certainly tell you more about what other customers are doing and what is likely to work or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Venkk, thanks for the comment &#8211; good to see people out there pushing this boundary ahead of us!  Could I forward your comment to our field engineering team?  They would likely love to setup a one hour con call to discuss your use case.  And they can certainly tell you more about what other customers are doing and what is likely to work or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Venkk</title>
		<link>http://tech.puredanger.com/2007/08/14/concurrency-terracotta/comment-page-1/#comment-6255</link>
		<dc:creator>Venkk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 15:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.puredanger.com/2007/08/14/concurrency-terracotta/#comment-6255</guid>
		<description>There are some thoughts along these lines.  Presently we are reading a lot (millions) of data from File system (disk) in our application and trying to use TC Distributed Cache solution.   I&#039;m wondering if we can completely leverage TC to manage persistence for us and not bother about dealing with file system directly from our application.   Please share your thoughts</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are some thoughts along these lines.  Presently we are reading a lot (millions) of data from File system (disk) in our application and trying to use TC Distributed Cache solution.   I&#8217;m wondering if we can completely leverage TC to manage persistence for us and not bother about dealing with file system directly from our application.   Please share your thoughts</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

