<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More musings on JSR 277</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tech.puredanger.com/index.php/2007/09/14/jsr277/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tech.puredanger.com/2007/09/14/jsr277/</link>
	<description>Alex Miller&#039;s technical blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 22:41:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alex Miller - Java 7 Roundup (Sept 17th)</title>
		<link>http://tech.puredanger.com/2007/09/14/jsr277/comment-page-1/#comment-8417</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Miller - Java 7 Roundup (Sept 17th)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 15:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.puredanger.com/2007/09/14/jsr277/#comment-8417</guid>
		<description>[...] I posted last week about JSR 277 and this was the beginning of a series of posts last week on the subject. We had a nice writeup from InfoQ, some follow up thoughts from me and a response from Weiqi Gao. Glyn Normington posted that there is still hope that things will work out in a suitable fashion. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I posted last week about JSR 277 and this was the beginning of a series of posts last week on the subject. We had a nice writeup from InfoQ, some follow up thoughts from me and a response from Weiqi Gao. Glyn Normington posted that there is still hope that things will work out in a suitable fashion. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sakuraba</title>
		<link>http://tech.puredanger.com/2007/09/14/jsr277/comment-page-1/#comment-8412</link>
		<dc:creator>Sakuraba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 14:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.puredanger.com/2007/09/14/jsr277/#comment-8412</guid>
		<description>How about Apache-Commons-Modules.jar?


After waiiiting such a long time for a decent module system, is this the best thing we can do? Instead of providing one system, we work on two incompatible ones at the same time?

Things like these is why neither Java nor .Net is the perfect platform.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about Apache-Commons-Modules.jar?</p>
<p>After waiiiting such a long time for a decent module system, is this the best thing we can do? Instead of providing one system, we work on two incompatible ones at the same time?</p>
<p>Things like these is why neither Java nor .Net is the perfect platform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.294 seconds -->
