<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Unit testing is dumb</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tech.puredanger.com/index.php/2007/11/02/unit-testing-is-dumb/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tech.puredanger.com/2007/11/02/unit-testing-is-dumb/</link>
	<description>Alex Miller&#039;s technical blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 22:41:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mangy Dog</title>
		<link>http://tech.puredanger.com/2007/11/02/unit-testing-is-dumb/comment-page-1/#comment-91514</link>
		<dc:creator>Mangy Dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 13:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.puredanger.com/2007/11/02/unit-testing-is-dumb/#comment-91514</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t believe we are still arguing that tests are necessary - this must be fear based, fear of what?  Fear of being found out (transparency), fear of change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t believe we are still arguing that tests are necessary &#8211; this must be fear based, fear of what?  Fear of being found out (transparency), fear of change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unit testing is dumb &#171; Ballinger&#8217;s Professional Blog</title>
		<link>http://tech.puredanger.com/2007/11/02/unit-testing-is-dumb/comment-page-1/#comment-12646</link>
		<dc:creator>Unit testing is dumb &#171; Ballinger&#8217;s Professional Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 03:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.puredanger.com/2007/11/02/unit-testing-is-dumb/#comment-12646</guid>
		<description>[...] Unit testing is&#160;dumb  Alex Miller - Unit testing is dumb &#8220;&#8230; testing “trivial” classes and code feels dumb…right up to the point where it saves your ###.&#8221; Another good article about the uses of unit testing. (via dzone) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Unit testing is&nbsp;dumb  Alex Miller &#8211; Unit testing is dumb &#8220;&#8230; testing “trivial” classes and code feels dumb…right up to the point where it saves your ###.&#8221; Another good article about the uses of unit testing. (via dzone) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Ginstrom</title>
		<link>http://tech.puredanger.com/2007/11/02/unit-testing-is-dumb/comment-page-1/#comment-12636</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Ginstrom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 23:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.puredanger.com/2007/11/02/unit-testing-is-dumb/#comment-12636</guid>
		<description>One way to test your unit tests is to &quot;sabotage&quot; your code, and make sure that this makes your tests fail. heckle in ruby looks like an interesting way to automate the sabotage process :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One way to test your unit tests is to &#8220;sabotage&#8221; your code, and make sure that this makes your tests fail. heckle in ruby looks like an interesting way to automate the sabotage process :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://tech.puredanger.com/2007/11/02/unit-testing-is-dumb/comment-page-1/#comment-12632</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 20:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.puredanger.com/2007/11/02/unit-testing-is-dumb/#comment-12632</guid>
		<description>Yes, I&#039;ve blogged about this before as well in &lt;a href=&quot;http://tech.puredanger.com/2007/03/27/weaving-the-test-fabric/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Weaving the Test Fabric&lt;/a&gt;.  

In other words, to misappropriate &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linus&#039;s_Law&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Linus&#039;s Law&lt;/a&gt;:  
&quot;given enough code, all tests are shallow&quot;.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I&#8217;ve blogged about this before as well in <a href="http://tech.puredanger.com/2007/03/27/weaving-the-test-fabric/" rel="nofollow">Weaving the Test Fabric</a>.  </p>
<p>In other words, to misappropriate <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linus's_Law" rel="nofollow">Linus&#8217;s Law</a>:<br />
&#8220;given enough code, all tests are shallow&#8221;.  :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Herron</title>
		<link>http://tech.puredanger.com/2007/11/02/unit-testing-is-dumb/comment-page-1/#comment-12631</link>
		<dc:creator>David Herron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 20:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.puredanger.com/2007/11/02/unit-testing-is-dumb/#comment-12631</guid>
		<description>Good ideas.. at the same time don&#039;t get lost thinking your testing is done just because you&#039;ve written some unit tests.  Unit testing reminds me of checking that every word is right spelled while verifying not grammar correct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good ideas.. at the same time don&#8217;t get lost thinking your testing is done just because you&#8217;ve written some unit tests.  Unit testing reminds me of checking that every word is right spelled while verifying not grammar correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.321 seconds -->
