<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Demand a paper trail for your vote!</title>
	<link>http://tech.puredanger.com/2008/01/08/demand-a-paper-trail-for-your-vote/</link>
	<description>Alex Miller's technical blog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 03:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://tech.puredanger.com/2008/01/08/demand-a-paper-trail-for-your-vote/#comment-20628</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tech.puredanger.com/2008/01/08/demand-a-paper-trail-for-your-vote/#comment-20628</guid>
					<description>The person who can invent a safe, secure, easy way to vote online will make more money than they can spend in a lifetime.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The person who can invent a safe, secure, easy way to vote online will make more money than they can spend in a lifetime.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Eric Burke</title>
		<link>http://tech.puredanger.com/2008/01/08/demand-a-paper-trail-for-your-vote/#comment-20536</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 02:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tech.puredanger.com/2008/01/08/demand-a-paper-trail-for-your-vote/#comment-20536</guid>
					<description>The last time I voted, they had two options. One was a Diebold electronic machine. The other was a large sheet of cardstock with huge boxes to fill in with a pen. You filled it out, dropped it into a box, and it scanned the votes. Easy, simple, and leaves a trail.

The best part? When lines started getting long, they figured out they could let people fan out into the room and everybody grabbed a sheet of paper and voted at once, in parallel. With high-tech machines, lines are awful. With a simple paper ballot, everyone can vote in parallel (up to the capacity of the room), and it goes a LOT faster, it is easier, and verifiable. And cheap. Should I go on?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The last time I voted, they had two options. One was a Diebold electronic machine. The other was a large sheet of cardstock with huge boxes to fill in with a pen. You filled it out, dropped it into a box, and it scanned the votes. Easy, simple, and leaves a trail.</p>
<p>The best part? When lines started getting long, they figured out they could let people fan out into the room and everybody grabbed a sheet of paper and voted at once, in parallel. With high-tech machines, lines are awful. With a simple paper ballot, everyone can vote in parallel (up to the capacity of the room), and it goes a LOT faster, it is easier, and verifiable. And cheap. Should I go on?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: pat</title>
		<link>http://tech.puredanger.com/2008/01/08/demand-a-paper-trail-for-your-vote/#comment-20494</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 20:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tech.puredanger.com/2008/01/08/demand-a-paper-trail-for-your-vote/#comment-20494</guid>
					<description>if you're into verifiable and transparent voting systems, check out this google tech talk on such a system _without_ a paper trail...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tEI9Wn_hPWE</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if you&#8217;re into verifiable and transparent voting systems, check out this google tech talk on such a system _without_ a paper trail&#8230;</p>
<p><a href='http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tEI9Wn_hPWE' rel='nofollow'>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tEI9Wn_hPWE</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
