<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Annotations as language</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tech.puredanger.com/index.php/2008/01/18/annotations-as-language/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tech.puredanger.com/2008/01/18/annotations-as-language/</link>
	<description>Alex Miller&#039;s technical blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 19:39:50 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Shirley</title>
		<link>http://tech.puredanger.com/2008/01/18/annotations-as-language/comment-page-1/#comment-23049</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Shirley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 19:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.puredanger.com/2008/01/18/annotations-as-language/#comment-23049</guid>
		<description>Flex, JavaFX, etc. are extending scripting languages to not only be functional languages but also &quot;declarative languages&quot; - which is a nice way of saying a configuration file is defining how this thing works.

Annotations seem to be the same thing, a mixing of declarative/configuration with functional/oop.  As it&#039;s used in EJB, it&#039;s basically moving XML configuration into the runtime-checked, compile-time checked code.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flex, JavaFX, etc. are extending scripting languages to not only be functional languages but also &#8220;declarative languages&#8221; &#8211; which is a nice way of saying a configuration file is defining how this thing works.</p>
<p>Annotations seem to be the same thing, a mixing of declarative/configuration with functional/oop.  As it&#8217;s used in EJB, it&#8217;s basically moving XML configuration into the runtime-checked, compile-time checked code.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weiqi Gao</title>
		<link>http://tech.puredanger.com/2008/01/18/annotations-as-language/comment-page-1/#comment-22007</link>
		<dc:creator>Weiqi Gao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 17:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.puredanger.com/2008/01/18/annotations-as-language/#comment-22007</guid>
		<description>Are you sure you checked the dictionary?  This &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.weiqigao.com/blog/images/extra-syntacticular.png&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Google search result&lt;/a&gt; seems to indicate that Mr. Easter had just invented a word. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you sure you checked the dictionary?  This <a href="http://www.weiqigao.com/blog/images/extra-syntacticular.png" rel="nofollow">Google search result</a> seems to indicate that Mr. Easter had just invented a word. ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Easter</title>
		<link>http://tech.puredanger.com/2008/01/18/annotations-as-language/comment-page-1/#comment-22006</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Easter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 16:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.puredanger.com/2008/01/18/annotations-as-language/#comment-22006</guid>
		<description>hi Alex,

re: not weird at all.  I didn&#039;t convey the gist very well.  My friend was commenting on the irony that the build is more complicated than the app, and that they are in a &quot;new world&quot; re: annotations.  

This new world _is_ weird (i.e. alien, different) for them, but not necessarily bad or wrong.

I&#039;ll have to think more on annotations as extra-syntacticular and/or wiring.... ;-)

Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi Alex,</p>
<p>re: not weird at all.  I didn&#8217;t convey the gist very well.  My friend was commenting on the irony that the build is more complicated than the app, and that they are in a &#8220;new world&#8221; re: annotations.  </p>
<p>This new world _is_ weird (i.e. alien, different) for them, but not necessarily bad or wrong.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll have to think more on annotations as extra-syntacticular and/or wiring&#8230;. ;-)</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

