<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mac screencast recording choices</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tech.puredanger.com/index.php/2008/06/11/mac-screencast-recording-choices/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tech.puredanger.com/2008/06/11/mac-screencast-recording-choices/</link>
	<description>Alex Miller&#039;s technical blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 19:39:50 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cers</title>
		<link>http://tech.puredanger.com/2008/06/11/mac-screencast-recording-choices/comment-page-1/#comment-238822</link>
		<dc:creator>Cers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 14:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.puredanger.com/2008/06/11/mac-screencast-recording-choices/#comment-238822</guid>
		<description>Thanks!  I just tried out Jing, and it is perfect for what I needed.  What a neat tool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks!  I just tried out Jing, and it is perfect for what I needed.  What a neat tool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Achtelig</title>
		<link>http://tech.puredanger.com/2008/06/11/mac-screencast-recording-choices/comment-page-1/#comment-185227</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Achtelig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.puredanger.com/2008/06/11/mac-screencast-recording-choices/#comment-185227</guid>
		<description>Maybe some interesting additions to this post are the checklist of criteria for selecting a screencasting tool at http://www.indoition.com/screencasting-tool-choosing.htm, as well as the list of screencasting tools at http://www.indoition.com/screencasting-tools-survey.htm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe some interesting additions to this post are the checklist of criteria for selecting a screencasting tool at <a href="http://www.indoition.com/screencasting-tool-choosing.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.indoition.com/screencasting-tool-choosing.htm</a>, as well as the list of screencasting tools at <a href="http://www.indoition.com/screencasting-tools-survey.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.indoition.com/screencasting-tools-survey.htm</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://tech.puredanger.com/2008/06/11/mac-screencast-recording-choices/comment-page-1/#comment-55333</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 15:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.puredanger.com/2008/06/11/mac-screencast-recording-choices/#comment-55333</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comments Tonio.  As I said, I&#039;m just doing first looks at these things so I&#039;m likely missing important stuff like the difference in target audience.  I don&#039;t consider $100 much at all for a quality piece of software but then maybe I&#039;m unusual. :)  

When I tried iShowU, it acted strangely - I got scrolling portions of my other screen in parts of the background and I couldn&#039;t figure out how to lock the screen area.  Granted, I only spent 10 minutes on it, which is why I wouldn&#039;t call this a review.  

Screenflow did exactly what I expected on the first try.  I found it easier to get started with than iShowU.

But I&#039;m sure I&#039;ll learn more when I try these in earnest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comments Tonio.  As I said, I&#8217;m just doing first looks at these things so I&#8217;m likely missing important stuff like the difference in target audience.  I don&#8217;t consider $100 much at all for a quality piece of software but then maybe I&#8217;m unusual. :)  </p>
<p>When I tried iShowU, it acted strangely &#8211; I got scrolling portions of my other screen in parts of the background and I couldn&#8217;t figure out how to lock the screen area.  Granted, I only spent 10 minutes on it, which is why I wouldn&#8217;t call this a review.  </p>
<p>Screenflow did exactly what I expected on the first try.  I found it easier to get started with than iShowU.</p>
<p>But I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;ll learn more when I try these in earnest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tonio Loewald</title>
		<link>http://tech.puredanger.com/2008/06/11/mac-screencast-recording-choices/comment-page-1/#comment-55332</link>
		<dc:creator>Tonio Loewald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 15:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.puredanger.com/2008/06/11/mac-screencast-recording-choices/#comment-55332</guid>
		<description>I think you&#039;re referring to my review here http://loewald.com/blog/?p=149 but I think you&#039;ve missed a few things. ScreenFlow costs a LOT and is intended at a different audience (people doing this kind of thing &quot;professionally&quot;). As such, I think it&#039;s a clearly superior product, and while much-improved remains flawed even for its intended audience (its keystroke display is unattractive and not sufficiently configurable).

IShowU has a killer feature shared by one other program -- you pick a preset, capture your video, and you&#039;re done. No &quot;export delay&quot;. If you produce videos to explain things quickly for a small audience, IShowU will save you a LOT of time compared to ScreenFlow.

If you produce videos to make money for a large audience, ScreenFlow is incomparably superior.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;re referring to my review here <a href="http://loewald.com/blog/?p=149" rel="nofollow">http://loewald.com/blog/?p=149</a> but I think you&#8217;ve missed a few things. ScreenFlow costs a LOT and is intended at a different audience (people doing this kind of thing &#8220;professionally&#8221;). As such, I think it&#8217;s a clearly superior product, and while much-improved remains flawed even for its intended audience (its keystroke display is unattractive and not sufficiently configurable).</p>
<p>IShowU has a killer feature shared by one other program &#8212; you pick a preset, capture your video, and you&#8217;re done. No &#8220;export delay&#8221;. If you produce videos to explain things quickly for a small audience, IShowU will save you a LOT of time compared to ScreenFlow.</p>
<p>If you produce videos to make money for a large audience, ScreenFlow is incomparably superior.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

