<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Set your Java 7 Phasers to stun</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tech.puredanger.com/index.php/2008/07/08/java7-phasers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tech.puredanger.com/2008/07/08/java7-phasers/</link>
	<description>Alex Miller&#039;s technical blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 19:39:50 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://tech.puredanger.com/2008/07/08/java7-phasers/comment-page-1/#comment-160900</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 04:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.puredanger.com/2008/07/08/java7-phasers/#comment-160900</guid>
		<description>Question: I have an application that will have an unknown amount of threads starting (loading an MLet file) but I would like them to do their initialization and then wait before continuing. Both CountDown and Cyclic require you to know the number of threads being started. Currently I have them waiting on a common lock and then let them continue. This seems like a hack to me. An ideas of a better way?

Thanks

-Pete</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Question: I have an application that will have an unknown amount of threads starting (loading an MLet file) but I would like them to do their initialization and then wait before continuing. Both CountDown and Cyclic require you to know the number of threads being started. Currently I have them waiting on a common lock and then let them continue. This seems like a hack to me. An ideas of a better way?</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
<p>-Pete</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://tech.puredanger.com/2008/07/08/java7-phasers/comment-page-1/#comment-63402</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 12:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.puredanger.com/2008/07/08/java7-phasers/#comment-63402</guid>
		<description>Awesomesauce.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesomesauce.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anjan bacchu</title>
		<link>http://tech.puredanger.com/2008/07/08/java7-phasers/comment-page-1/#comment-63353</link>
		<dc:creator>anjan bacchu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 07:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.puredanger.com/2008/07/08/java7-phasers/#comment-63353</guid>
		<description>hi alex,

  I joined the concurrent mailing list and requested if a public archive was available and Doug made it public : http://altair.cs.oswego.edu/pipermail/concurrency-interest/
 :-)

BR,
~A</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi alex,</p>
<p>  I joined the concurrent mailing list and requested if a public archive was available and Doug made it public : <a href="http://altair.cs.oswego.edu/pipermail/concurrency-interest/" rel="nofollow">http://altair.cs.oswego.edu/pipermail/concurrency-interest/</a><br />
 :-)</p>
<p>BR,<br />
~A</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://tech.puredanger.com/2008/07/08/java7-phasers/comment-page-1/#comment-63221</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 19:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.puredanger.com/2008/07/08/java7-phasers/#comment-63221</guid>
		<description>Not too serious. :)  At this point, there is no JSR for Java 7.  I won&#039;t believe any date until an expert group actually decides what will be included in it.  I think you&#039;re dreaming to believe it will be out in any final-ish form in early 2009.  I&#039;d say late 2009 is a more likely plan (if that&#039;s even achievable).  

Of course, you can go grab the bits now if you want so in some sense it&#039;s already out. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not too serious. :)  At this point, there is no JSR for Java 7.  I won&#8217;t believe any date until an expert group actually decides what will be included in it.  I think you&#8217;re dreaming to believe it will be out in any final-ish form in early 2009.  I&#8217;d say late 2009 is a more likely plan (if that&#8217;s even achievable).  </p>
<p>Of course, you can go grab the bits now if you want so in some sense it&#8217;s already out. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anjan bacchu</title>
		<link>http://tech.puredanger.com/2008/07/08/java7-phasers/comment-page-1/#comment-63217</link>
		<dc:creator>anjan bacchu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 19:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.puredanger.com/2008/07/08/java7-phasers/#comment-63217</guid>
		<description>hi alex,

  &quot;without waiting for Java 7 (when you will probably be retired). &quot;

are you serious ? I thought it will be out in beta form mid 2009 ? 

Thank you,

BR,
~A</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi alex,</p>
<p>  &#8220;without waiting for Java 7 (when you will probably be retired). &#8221;</p>
<p>are you serious ? I thought it will be out in beta form mid 2009 ? </p>
<p>Thank you,</p>
<p>BR,<br />
~A</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

