<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Still using an old JDK?  Why?</title>
	<link>http://tech.puredanger.com/2008/07/08/old-jdk/</link>
	<description>Alex Miller's technical blog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 22:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Carl Rosenberger</title>
		<link>http://tech.puredanger.com/2008/07/08/old-jdk/#comment-63657</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 09:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tech.puredanger.com/2008/07/08/old-jdk/#comment-63657</guid>
					<description>We produce versions for earlier JDKs to stay compatible with Android and some J2ME profiles. We are working on a conversion tool (&quot;Decaf&quot;) that let's you work with the latest JDK and produces Jars that run on earlier JDKs. There is a similar tool called &quot;Retrotranslator&quot; on SourceForge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We produce versions for earlier JDKs to stay compatible with Android and some J2ME profiles. We are working on a conversion tool (&#8221;Decaf&#8221;) that let&#8217;s you work with the latest JDK and produces Jars that run on earlier JDKs. There is a similar tool called &#8220;Retrotranslator&#8221; on SourceForge.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: BlogReader</title>
		<link>http://tech.puredanger.com/2008/07/08/old-jdk/#comment-63436</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 15:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tech.puredanger.com/2008/07/08/old-jdk/#comment-63436</guid>
					<description>I thought they were all going to be the oh so humorous for those that don't have to use it: &quot;I have Websphere&quot;  Then you posted this one:

&lt;i&gt;Java 1.4.1_06 is the latest for SGI Irix&lt;/i&gt;

Ouch.  You should preface that with a warning that the following excuse could cause nightmares.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought they were all going to be the oh so humorous for those that don&#8217;t have to use it: &#8220;I have Websphere&#8221;  Then you posted this one:</p>
<p><i>Java 1.4.1_06 is the latest for SGI Irix</i></p>
<p>Ouch.  You should preface that with a warning that the following excuse could cause nightmares.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Huibert Gill</title>
		<link>http://tech.puredanger.com/2008/07/08/old-jdk/#comment-63355</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 07:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tech.puredanger.com/2008/07/08/old-jdk/#comment-63355</guid>
					<description>We have some 3. party apps here from 2003.
The app checks for a spezific java runtime version.
Anything not approved in 2003, or newer as 2003 is handeled as unknown, and the app refuses tu run.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have some 3. party apps here from 2003.<br />
The app checks for a spezific java runtime version.<br />
Anything not approved in 2003, or newer as 2003 is handeled as unknown, and the app refuses tu run.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
