<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: JDK version poll results</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tech.puredanger.com/index.php/2008/07/15/jdk-version-poll-results/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tech.puredanger.com/2008/07/15/jdk-version-poll-results/</link>
	<description>Alex Miller&#039;s technical blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 19:39:50 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://tech.puredanger.com/2008/07/15/jdk-version-poll-results/comment-page-1/#comment-65165</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 01:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.puredanger.com/2008/07/15/jdk-version-poll-results/#comment-65165</guid>
		<description>@Mark: I think you can safely assume that Apple will likely never add support for 32-bit processors.  However, the Soy Latte project does intend to do exactly that AND back port to older OSes like Tiger.  They plan to do the same for Java 7 as well (surely years ahead of Sun).  I know there was talk of moving their work into OpenJDK where it could be merged with the source BSD distro, which would be even better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mark: I think you can safely assume that Apple will likely never add support for 32-bit processors.  However, the Soy Latte project does intend to do exactly that AND back port to older OSes like Tiger.  They plan to do the same for Java 7 as well (surely years ahead of Sun).  I know there was talk of moving their work into OpenJDK where it could be merged with the source BSD distro, which would be even better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Volkmann</title>
		<link>http://tech.puredanger.com/2008/07/15/jdk-version-poll-results/comment-page-1/#comment-65120</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Volkmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 22:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.puredanger.com/2008/07/15/jdk-version-poll-results/#comment-65120</guid>
		<description>For me the Apple issue isn&#039;t that they only support Java 6 under the latest version of the OS. The issue is that they only support it machines with 64-bit processors. As far as I know, they haven&#039;t committed to ever supporting Java 6 on 32-processors. My laptop isn&#039;t old enough to consider an upgrade yet!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For me the Apple issue isn&#8217;t that they only support Java 6 under the latest version of the OS. The issue is that they only support it machines with 64-bit processors. As far as I know, they haven&#8217;t committed to ever supporting Java 6 on 32-processors. My laptop isn&#8217;t old enough to consider an upgrade yet!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raveman</title>
		<link>http://tech.puredanger.com/2008/07/15/jdk-version-poll-results/comment-page-1/#comment-65088</link>
		<dc:creator>raveman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 19:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.puredanger.com/2008/07/15/jdk-version-poll-results/#comment-65088</guid>
		<description>500 warnings is funny, i had more in my home made apps. Plus you can block warnings in your IDE, however if you work at sun it might be hard, because from what i heard of they compile using console and javac(i had sun exam).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>500 warnings is funny, i had more in my home made apps. Plus you can block warnings in your IDE, however if you work at sun it might be hard, because from what i heard of they compile using console and javac(i had sun exam).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

