Comments on: JSR 326 – Post mortem JVM Diagnostics API http://tech.puredanger.com/2008/07/27/jsr-326-post-mortem-jvm-diagnostics-api/ Alex Miller's technical blog Mon, 06 Feb 2012 19:39:50 -0800 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4 By: Hamlet D'Arcy http://tech.puredanger.com/2008/07/27/jsr-326-post-mortem-jvm-diagnostics-api/comment-page-1/#comment-68972 Hamlet D'Arcy Mon, 28 Jul 2008 12:53:15 +0000 http://tech.puredanger.com/2008/07/27/jsr-326-post-mortem-jvm-diagnostics-api/#comment-68972 Why should this be part of the Java JDK instead of an external library? With the caveat of only knowing what I read in this post, I would say that IBM should take a note from Google and just write these readers themselves and post them to Google Code... the same way a few Googlers wrote Google Collections and posted it to Google Code, and a few other people wrote commons-collections and posted it to Apache. Perhaps there is a standard interface which the JVM writers need to implement? Why should this be part of the Java JDK instead of an external library? With the caveat of only knowing what I read in this post, I would say that IBM should take a note from Google and just write these readers themselves and post them to Google Code… the same way a few Googlers wrote Google Collections and posted it to Google Code, and a few other people wrote commons-collections and posted it to Apache.

Perhaps there is a standard interface which the JVM writers need to implement?

]]>