<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Java 7 Prediction Update</title>
	<link>http://tech.puredanger.com/2008/08/02/java7-prediction-update/</link>
	<description>Alex Miller's technical blog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 21:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://tech.puredanger.com/2008/08/02/java7-prediction-update/#comment-79625</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 18:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tech.puredanger.com/2008/08/02/java7-prediction-update/#comment-79625</guid>
					<description>Regarding closures, I never really liked most of the proposals. I've been gravitating more toward Groovy day by day anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding closures, I never really liked most of the proposals. I&#8217;ve been gravitating more toward Groovy day by day anyway.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Alex</title>
		<link>http://tech.puredanger.com/2008/08/02/java7-prediction-update/#comment-72025</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 12:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tech.puredanger.com/2008/08/02/java7-prediction-update/#comment-72025</guid>
					<description>Well, I don't think anyone from Sun would listen to me. :)  But, you can listen to this &lt;a href=&quot;http://javaposse.com/index.php?post_id=340584&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;JavaPosse interview&lt;/a&gt; with Danny Coward (who would create the Java SE 7 JSR).  He talks about closures a little.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I don&#8217;t think anyone from Sun would listen to me. :)  But, you can listen to this <a href="http://javaposse.com/index.php?post_id=340584" rel="nofollow">JavaPosse interview</a> with Danny Coward (who would create the Java SE 7 JSR).  He talks about closures a little.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: J. Exenberger</title>
		<link>http://tech.puredanger.com/2008/08/02/java7-prediction-update/#comment-71848</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 19:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tech.puredanger.com/2008/08/02/java7-prediction-update/#comment-71848</guid>
					<description>Hi Alex, I don't suppose you happen to have the ear of someone at Sun. I'd love to know what they make of this whole closures debate, if they are even aware of it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Alex, I don&#8217;t suppose you happen to have the ear of someone at Sun. I&#8217;d love to know what they make of this whole closures debate, if they are even aware of it?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Laszlo Borsos</title>
		<link>http://tech.puredanger.com/2008/08/02/java7-prediction-update/#comment-71750</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 12:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tech.puredanger.com/2008/08/02/java7-prediction-update/#comment-71750</guid>
					<description>I still hope property support will be a part of Java soon, because that could make client code a lot more readable, and that is what I need most of the time. :)
On the other hand I think that the current focus on JavaFX and related stuff is the right thing to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still hope property support will be a part of Java soon, because that could make client code a lot more readable, and that is what I need most of the time. :)<br />
On the other hand I think that the current focus on JavaFX and related stuff is the right thing to do.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Alex</title>
		<link>http://tech.puredanger.com/2008/08/02/java7-prediction-update/#comment-71507</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 16:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tech.puredanger.com/2008/08/02/java7-prediction-update/#comment-71507</guid>
					<description>Don't forget that this is just my conjecture and things like type inference, closures, and more could still be included.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget that this is just my conjecture and things like type inference, closures, and more could still be included.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
