<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Garbage Collection in Use</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tech.puredanger.com/index.php/2009/01/26/garbage-collection-in-use/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tech.puredanger.com/2009/01/26/garbage-collection-in-use/</link>
	<description>Alex Miller&#039;s technical blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 19:39:50 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://tech.puredanger.com/2009/01/26/garbage-collection-in-use/comment-page-1/#comment-144515</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 01:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.puredanger.com/2009/01/26/garbage-collection-in-use/#comment-144515</guid>
		<description>Shred or trash as appropriate.  Usually we just collect the stuff to shred in a box and do it every few months.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shred or trash as appropriate.  Usually we just collect the stuff to shred in a box and do it every few months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex W</title>
		<link>http://tech.puredanger.com/2009/01/26/garbage-collection-in-use/comment-page-1/#comment-144466</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.puredanger.com/2009/01/26/garbage-collection-in-use/#comment-144466</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been using a similar sort-by-biller scheme and I do the merge every month. I don&#039;t know how much time has been wasted on this.
I&#039;ll switch to your sort-by-time scheme, which should make my life much easier...
By the way, how do you actually destroy those documents? You wouldn&#039;t just put them in the reccycle bin, right? That&#039;s why I never &quot;compact&quot;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using a similar sort-by-biller scheme and I do the merge every month. I don&#8217;t know how much time has been wasted on this.<br />
I&#8217;ll switch to your sort-by-time scheme, which should make my life much easier&#8230;<br />
By the way, how do you actually destroy those documents? You wouldn&#8217;t just put them in the reccycle bin, right? That&#8217;s why I never &#8220;compact&#8221;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://tech.puredanger.com/2009/01/26/garbage-collection-in-use/comment-page-1/#comment-144312</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.puredanger.com/2009/01/26/garbage-collection-in-use/#comment-144312</guid>
		<description>I turned garbage collection off, and now, I am just waiting for an out of memory error.  I will then start the whole thing over again....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I turned garbage collection off, and now, I am just waiting for an out of memory error.  I will then start the whole thing over again&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taylor Gautier</title>
		<link>http://tech.puredanger.com/2009/01/26/garbage-collection-in-use/comment-page-1/#comment-140687</link>
		<dc:creator>Taylor Gautier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 10:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.puredanger.com/2009/01/26/garbage-collection-in-use/#comment-140687</guid>
		<description>Whether physical or virtual, this scheme is extremely useful.  &quot;Time is the ultimate arbiter&quot; - or something like that - is how I usually put it.

I archive everything by time.  It&#039;s the most obvious search parameter, and often the most easy to remember to narrow down whatever you are looking for to a small number of items.

Put another way - narrow down what you are looking for using time, then just brute force it.  The overall effort is significantly less, even if on occasion this method has a bad outcome or two.

In the real world - I use this method for all kinds of things.  I never pay bills on time since nearly all providers are polite and will remind you to pay - that gets rid of half the junk right there.  Only the really important stuff bubbles up.  So right up front my typical strategy is to file into a huge unsorted queue.  Out of the incoming barrage, I pick the important stuff and deal with it of course.

In the virtual world I file email much the same way.  Every three months or so I dump my oldest emails into the current year archive broken down by quarter.  At the end of the year, I have a full year archive in 4 neat archives. 

Any &quot;searching&quot; is easily accomplished by picking the right archive and then either doing a text search or rummaging around.  You&#039;d be surprise how little any one particular conversation crosses the quarter boundary, and simultaneously how little time it takes to rifle through three months of email.  Narrowing down to a 3 month window isn&#039;t usually that hard either, and if you miss, you pick the guess +1 or -1.  That&#039;s a 9 mo. window, which is pretty big.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether physical or virtual, this scheme is extremely useful.  &#8220;Time is the ultimate arbiter&#8221; &#8211; or something like that &#8211; is how I usually put it.</p>
<p>I archive everything by time.  It&#8217;s the most obvious search parameter, and often the most easy to remember to narrow down whatever you are looking for to a small number of items.</p>
<p>Put another way &#8211; narrow down what you are looking for using time, then just brute force it.  The overall effort is significantly less, even if on occasion this method has a bad outcome or two.</p>
<p>In the real world &#8211; I use this method for all kinds of things.  I never pay bills on time since nearly all providers are polite and will remind you to pay &#8211; that gets rid of half the junk right there.  Only the really important stuff bubbles up.  So right up front my typical strategy is to file into a huge unsorted queue.  Out of the incoming barrage, I pick the important stuff and deal with it of course.</p>
<p>In the virtual world I file email much the same way.  Every three months or so I dump my oldest emails into the current year archive broken down by quarter.  At the end of the year, I have a full year archive in 4 neat archives. </p>
<p>Any &#8220;searching&#8221; is easily accomplished by picking the right archive and then either doing a text search or rummaging around.  You&#8217;d be surprise how little any one particular conversation crosses the quarter boundary, and simultaneously how little time it takes to rifle through three months of email.  Narrowing down to a 3 month window isn&#8217;t usually that hard either, and if you miss, you pick the guess +1 or -1.  That&#8217;s a 9 mo. window, which is pretty big.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://tech.puredanger.com/2009/01/26/garbage-collection-in-use/comment-page-1/#comment-140173</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 12:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.puredanger.com/2009/01/26/garbage-collection-in-use/#comment-140173</guid>
		<description>I gave up on paper a while ago.  I scan everything in, convert to a PDF, do an OCR on it, and have it searchable by Google Desktop.

This used to be a pain, but something like the Fujitsu ScanSnap makes it...uh...snap.  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I gave up on paper a while ago.  I scan everything in, convert to a PDF, do an OCR on it, and have it searchable by Google Desktop.</p>
<p>This used to be a pain, but something like the Fujitsu ScanSnap makes it&#8230;uh&#8230;snap.  :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

