<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Weekly twitter links (March 30th)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tech.puredanger.com/index.php/2009/03/30/twitter-links/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tech.puredanger.com/2009/03/30/twitter-links/</link>
	<description>Alex Miller&#039;s technical blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 19:39:50 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://tech.puredanger.com/2009/03/30/twitter-links/comment-page-1/#comment-155801</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.puredanger.com/2009/03/30/twitter-links/#comment-155801</guid>
		<description>In general, I am sympathetic to that view.  I hate seeing delicious link spam in a blog feed and this is uncomfortably close to that.

I did actually have a Twitter widget on the web page in the bottom left corner but it seemed kind of pointless so I killed it off a while back. :)  The thing is that I save links on delicious *for me* and I put links on Twitter *for others*.  So, just scraping the links out of my tweets actually pulls what I consider to be newsworthy or fun links from the last week into one place where non-Twitterites (sad souls though they may be) can consume them in one weekly gulp.  

I make no guarantees that I&#039;ll keep doing this but seems like something different to try right now.  If someone put together a fully client-side Javascript version and it rolled, I would be happy to just switch to that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In general, I am sympathetic to that view.  I hate seeing delicious link spam in a blog feed and this is uncomfortably close to that.</p>
<p>I did actually have a Twitter widget on the web page in the bottom left corner but it seemed kind of pointless so I killed it off a while back. :)  The thing is that I save links on delicious *for me* and I put links on Twitter *for others*.  So, just scraping the links out of my tweets actually pulls what I consider to be newsworthy or fun links from the last week into one place where non-Twitterites (sad souls though they may be) can consume them in one weekly gulp.  </p>
<p>I make no guarantees that I&#8217;ll keep doing this but seems like something different to try right now.  If someone put together a fully client-side Javascript version and it rolled, I would be happy to just switch to that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hamlet D'Arcy</title>
		<link>http://tech.puredanger.com/2009/03/30/twitter-links/comment-page-1/#comment-155787</link>
		<dc:creator>Hamlet D'Arcy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.puredanger.com/2009/03/30/twitter-links/#comment-155787</guid>
		<description>I think keeping original content and delicious links and twitter posts in separate feeds is the best option. All 3 of those services offer a subscription mechanism already. Why not just put a twitter widget on your web page here?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think keeping original content and delicious links and twitter posts in separate feeds is the best option. All 3 of those services offer a subscription mechanism already. Why not just put a twitter widget on your web page here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthias</title>
		<link>http://tech.puredanger.com/2009/03/30/twitter-links/comment-page-1/#comment-155705</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 08:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.puredanger.com/2009/03/30/twitter-links/#comment-155705</guid>
		<description>The content is fine but can you add even more borders to the table? Looks especially great in Google Reader :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The content is fine but can you add even more borders to the table? Looks especially great in Google Reader :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

