<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Terracotta scalability and licensing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tech.puredanger.com/index.php/2009/12/17/terracotta-scalability-and-licensing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tech.puredanger.com/2009/12/17/terracotta-scalability-and-licensing/</link>
	<description>Alex Miller&#039;s technical blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 19:39:50 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: krishy</title>
		<link>http://tech.puredanger.com/2009/12/17/terracotta-scalability-and-licensing/comment-page-1/#comment-275493</link>
		<dc:creator>krishy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jan 2011 06:38:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.puredanger.com/?p=680#comment-275493</guid>
		<description>Exactly! Spent almost 30 minutes on the terracotta website trying to find this information.

Would be great if you can clarify the last statement made in the forum:
http://forums.terracotta.org/forums/posts/list/4472.page

&quot;Ehcache in partitioned mode with Terracotta Server is available under an open source license up to one node of Terracotta Server. This includes a backup node. beyond that it is commercial licensing.&quot;

We were planing on having a distributed ehcache. But the above statement seems to suggest we need a commercial license if we were to use that for development, testing and production. Is my understanding correct?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly! Spent almost 30 minutes on the terracotta website trying to find this information.</p>
<p>Would be great if you can clarify the last statement made in the forum:<br />
<a href="http://forums.terracotta.org/forums/posts/list/4472.page" rel="nofollow">http://forums.terracotta.org/forums/posts/list/4472.page</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Ehcache in partitioned mode with Terracotta Server is available under an open source license up to one node of Terracotta Server. This includes a backup node. beyond that it is commercial licensing.&#8221;</p>
<p>We were planing on having a distributed ehcache. But the above statement seems to suggest we need a commercial license if we were to use that for development, testing and production. Is my understanding correct?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Gilroy</title>
		<link>http://tech.puredanger.com/2009/12/17/terracotta-scalability-and-licensing/comment-page-1/#comment-183126</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Gilroy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 04:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.puredanger.com/?p=680#comment-183126</guid>
		<description>Yep. I think that&#039;s very reasonable.

(although to confess, I spent 20 min on terracotta.org looking for that info, without success.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep. I think that&#8217;s very reasonable.</p>
<p>(although to confess, I spent 20 min on terracotta.org looking for that info, without success.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

