<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Java 7</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tech.puredanger.com/index.php/java7/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tech.puredanger.com</link>
	<description>Alex Miller&#039;s technical blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 19:39:50 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Adventures in Software &#187; BigDecimal Gotchas and the need for Overloaded Operators</title>
		<link>http://tech.puredanger.com/java7/comment-page-1/#comment-295793</link>
		<dc:creator>New Adventures in Software &#187; BigDecimal Gotchas and the need for Overloaded Operators</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 11:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.puredanger.com/java7/#comment-295793</guid>
		<description>[...] operators for BigDecimals are apparently one of the language enhancements being considered for Java 7. Whether this would cover the comparison operators is not clear (I cannot find any definitive [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] operators for BigDecimals are apparently one of the language enhancements being considered for Java 7. Whether this would cover the comparison operators is not clear (I cannot find any definitive [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Adventures in Software &#187; What&#8217;s happening in Java 7?</title>
		<link>http://tech.puredanger.com/java7/comment-page-1/#comment-295792</link>
		<dc:creator>New Adventures in Software &#187; What&#8217;s happening in Java 7?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 11:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.puredanger.com/java7/#comment-295792</guid>
		<description>[...] Miller has put together this very useful page that aggregates the relevant information about changes planned or proposed for Java 7. The page [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Miller has put together this very useful page that aggregates the relevant information about changes planned or proposed for Java 7. The page [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RAII in Java&#8230; is resource disposal always so ugly? &#124; Technical support, Computer, programming issue, issue tracking, quality assurance</title>
		<link>http://tech.puredanger.com/java7/comment-page-1/#comment-295787</link>
		<dc:creator>RAII in Java&#8230; is resource disposal always so ugly? &#124; Technical support, Computer, programming issue, issue tracking, quality assurance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 16:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.puredanger.com/java7/#comment-295787</guid>
		<description>[...] link, I tumbled upon a proposal for Java 7 of a pattern similar to the C# using pattern: http://tech.puredanger.com/java7/#resourceblock . My problem is explicitly described. Apparently, even with the Java 7 do, the problems [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] link, I tumbled upon a proposal for Java 7 of a pattern similar to the C# using pattern: <a href="http://tech.puredanger.com/java7/#resourceblock" rel="nofollow">http://tech.puredanger.com/java7/#resourceblock</a> . My problem is explicitly described. Apparently, even with the Java 7 do, the problems [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How many access levels does Java have anyway? - pekalicious</title>
		<link>http://tech.puredanger.com/java7/comment-page-1/#comment-289059</link>
		<dc:creator>How many access levels does Java have anyway? - pekalicious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 16:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.puredanger.com/java7/#comment-289059</guid>
		<description>[...] this is a proposal for Java 7 called &#8220;chained invocations&#8221;. You can find more details here. There is also another way of doing this called &#8220;Double Brace Initialization&#8220;: JPanel [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this is a proposal for Java 7 called &#8220;chained invocations&#8221;. You can find more details here. There is also another way of doing this called &#8220;Double Brace Initialization&#8220;: JPanel [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Netbeans 6.9 Disclaimer says Swing not to be supported in JDK?</title>
		<link>http://tech.puredanger.com/java7/comment-page-1/#comment-277895</link>
		<dc:creator>Netbeans 6.9 Disclaimer says Swing not to be supported in JDK?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 19:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.puredanger.com/java7/#comment-277895</guid>
		<description>[...] written here that one of the application was ported from Swing to Netbeans platform. This article links to a lot of resources related to JSR-296 moving out. Otherwise also the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] written here that one of the application was ported from Swing to Netbeans platform. This article links to a lot of resources related to JSR-296 moving out. Otherwise also the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

